No Receiver Agreement Found for
Since my scenario is B-B, I checked the virtual recipient box and filled in all the details it contains. Try to find out in which component XI the error occurred. The possible components depend on the scenario you are using. The standard scenario includes a sending system, the Integration Server (IS), and a receiving system. Basically, there are two ways to find out in which system the error occurred: use end-to-end monitoring or look for systems step by step starting with the sender, then the IS and finally the receiving system with the individual monitoring tools. 0 No recipient agreement reached. Fix: Set the recipient agreement in the XI directory. Restart the message. Call the Integration Server and call the SMQR transaction in the sender and receiver integration engine in the corresponding system client. Depending on the specific error code, you may need to verify the address that was determined at the Technical Routing pipeline step and that is in the outbound link. Verify that the address points to the intended recipient (in our scenario, the intended recipient is the adapter engine) and that the authentication data is valid. If the initial binding refers to an SM59 destination, you can test the connection by using the SM59 transaction.
2.Just make a few changes to the recipient`s communication channel and recipient`s agreement and enable them. In this step, you need to get the relevant information to « track » the document via XI, that is, to know the path that the wrong document has taken from the sender to the recipient. The recipient determined by the Integration Server is located in the element of the main header. Addressing information is calculated at the Technical Routing pipeline stage and entered in the OutboundBinding header. You are riight I made a mistake in creating RD because I used the checkbox of the virtual receiver. 0 No outbound links found. Fix: Set an initial binding for this message in the XI directory. Restart the message.
Here we describe individual monitoring (step-by-step approach), that is, we successively inspect the monitoring tools based on the components of the sender to the integration server, the adapter motors to the receiver. The scan starts with the transmitting system and goes in the direction of the receiver. In the scenario described here, this process begins with checking the IDoc status in the sender. 3. Check the pipeline step of determining the receptor in the soap head to see if the juice receiver is slightly filled or empty. If it is empty, there is definitely an error in your configuration. If the recipient of a message cannot be determined, there can be two reasons: for authentication or authorization errors (HTTP error codes 401, 403), make sure that the user and password are set on the recipient (on the adapter engine) and that the user has the correct role (the user must have the role SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER_MAIN). 0 The basic technical configuration is incorrect.
For example, the target enterprise system used in determining a recipient is not defined in the SLD, or the user does not have permissions to connect to the target system. Possible causes of error on the receiver are possible: No receiver agreement found for the sender INLD50033057,PIP0C2_R0102_Responder and the receiver U6X,PIP0C2_R0102_Initiator,sap.com/xi/RosettaNet/PIP0C2_R0102,AsynchronousTestConfirmationAction 3. Verify that you specify the correct settings or not in the recipient`s agreement. 2. Check your recipient to see if they are case sensitive. 0 The definitions in Directory XI are inconsistent or incomplete. For example, no recipient determination has been defined for a specific set of message header information. Then, this message cannot be delivered. This is also the case if the physical address information is not set or incorrect (incorrect URL, wrong user). I get a bug that is « no recipient agreement found » in sxmb_moni, but I did the test setup in ID that works well.
For this reason, RD does not match the receiving system. A request was sent by an IDOC via XI. The corresponding message did not reach the receiving system. If the scheduler has the Wait status, it expects free worker processes. For this reason, there are delays in processing XML messages. . If the IDoc adapter on the integration server is not configured correctly, these errors become visible on the sending system. Verify the SM58 transaction for the failed IDoc function modules. In case of authentication or authorization errors, you can also find information in the system log (SM21 transaction).
By using this website, you agree to security monitoring and auditing. For security reasons and to ensure that the public service remains accessible to users, this government computer system uses network traffic monitoring programs to identify unauthorized attempts to upload or modify information, or otherwise cause damage, including attempts to deny service to users. . Possible causes of errors are: Incorrect message format, code page not available. In this case, you need to analyze in more detail with technical experts. . Here are the typical routing failure situations: Here is the relevant pipeline step in the Message Monitor of the call adapters. A number of HTTP communication errors can occur.
For more analysis of the cause of the problem, see the HTTP error code documentation. Check the cache and see what you specified for the sending system and the recipient`s system name. You already have an active moderator notification for this content. Check the status of the scheduler and the status of the XBQ* and XBT* queues: no enterprise systems are stored in the SLD for the sending system ID and the client. As a result, the transformation of the IDoc into Message XI failed. If the WE05 transaction indicates that the IDoc management was successfully transferred to TRFC (status 03), check the IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS function module in the sender`s SM58 transaction for errors. Here, for example.B. you will find the following entries: 0 For IDocs sent from SAP systems, the port consists of the SAP prefix and the SID of the SAP system. ? Destination to read metadata that is not defined in IDX1 See Problem analysis scenario message on adapter engine failed.
. 0 Incorrect physical address. After the technical routing pipeline step is successful, the OutboundBinding message header specifies the technical address in the ChannelAttributes element. The physical address can be specified by means of an SM59 destination or by setting the destination URL directly in the header. In the first case, open the SM59 transaction and verify the specified destination. In the latter case, check whether the header attributes define a valid destination address. Call the WE05 transaction, set an appropriate timeout, or enter the IDoc number to see if the IDoc has been sent. Since you tested it in ID, I guess it would be a cache issue.
– In the integration repository/directory, go to the Environment -> Clear SLD Data Cache? Problems in underlying technologies, such as .B. the file system is full? Incorrect configuration in the XI, e.B directory. Incorrect routing Current policies limit each user to a total of no more than 10 requests per second, regardless of the number of machines used to send requests. To ensure that SEC.gov remains available to all users, we reserve the right to block IP addresses that make excessive requests. . If all the necessary queues are not saved, you can use the SMQ2 transaction to search for queues with the name prefix above. Use SXMB_ADM to save the queues in this case. ? The RFC destination contains errors (for example.B.
the user does not have required permissions). See Problem analysis scenario For a specific message type, mapping fails. In the example above, you can see an error code (OUTBOUND_BINDING_NOT_FOUND) with explanatory text: Transaction IDX1: Port, Client, Rfc destination contains error 1. All cache issues in the ABAP stack and java stack. .